Multi stage safety injection device and passive safety injection system having the same

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure may disclose a multi stage safety injection device and a passive safety injection system having the same, including a safety injection tank formed to contain coolant to be injected into a reactor vessel by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased, a pressure balance line connected to the reactor vessel and safety injection tank to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, a safety injection line connected to a lower end portion of the safety injection tank and the reactor vessel to inject coolant to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, and a flow control line extended from the safety injection line to an inner portion of the safety injection tank, and provided with safety injection ports into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank, in order to inject coolant to the reactor vessel at multi stages.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(a), this application claims the benefit of earlier filing date and right of priority to Korean Application No. 10-2013-0016001, filed on Feb. 14, 2013, the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

1. Field of the Disclosure

The present disclosure relates to a multi stage safety injection device using a flow control line capable of injecting coolant into a reactor vessel step by step when an accident occurs in a reactor, and a passive safety injection system having the same.

2. Description of the Related Art

A Reactor can be classified according to the configuration of a safety system or the installation location of a main component. According to the characteristics of a safety system, a reactor can be classified into i) an active reactor using an active force such as a pump or the like, and ii) a passive reactor using a passive force such as gravity force, pressure force or the like. And also according to the installation location of main components(steam generators, a pressurizer, and reactor coolant pumps), a reactor can be classified into i) a loop type reactor in which main component are installed out of the reactor vessel, and ii) an integral reactor in which main components are installed within the reactor vessel.

When an accident occurs in a reactor, passive tanks with various types are used to supply emergency cooling water to a reactor vessel. i) A nitrogen pressurized safety injection tank (accumulator) for rapidly supplying coolant to a reactor during a large break loss of coolant accident, in which a large line is fractured to outflow a large amount of coolant, is used in many commercial loop type water reactors, and ii) a core makeup tank using a gravitational head of water subsequent to making a pressure balance between the reactor and tank is used in addition to a nitrogen pressurized safety injection tank in the U.S. Westinghouse passive loop type reactors such as AP600, AP1000 and so on.

In the integral reactor, main components such pumps and steam generators or the like are installed within the reactor vessel contrary to the commercial loop type water reactor, and thus there are no large lines for connecting the main components. Accordingly, the lines, which connecting a reactor vessel and systems such as a chemical and volume system, a safety injection system, a shutdown cooling system, a safety valve, and the like, have small size in an integral reactor. Due to these characteristics, a large break loss of coolant accident, where large lines are fractured, is eliminated fundamentally.

Furthermore, in the integral reactor (SMART reactor: Korea, mPower: B&W Company, NuScale: NuScale Power LLC, WEC-SMR: Westinghouse Electric Company), main components are installed in a reactor vessel, where a large amount of coolant exists. Accordingly, when an accident, a loss of coolant accident due to a break such as a line fracture or the like, occurs in the integral reactor, the pressure and water level within the reactor vessel are slowly decreased compared to those of a loop type reactor.

A passive safety system in a reactor refers to a system for safely maintaining a reactor only using a natural force contained in the system without using an active device such as a pump even without operator's action or safety rated AC power such as an emergency diesel generator for more than a period of time (currently required 72 hours) required for the reactor when an accident occurs.

Even the integral reactor has such characteristics, in general, the integral reactor requires i) a high flow rate of safety injection at the initial stage of the accident in which the core level is relatively fast decreased, ii) a medium-level amount of (medium flow rate of) safety injection at the early and middle stages of the accident in which the coolant discharge flow rate of the reactor is relatively large due to a high pressure of the reactor vessel, and iii) a relatively small amount of (low flow rate of) safety injection at the middle and late stages of the accident in which the coolant discharge flow rate is greatly reduced due to a decreased pressure of the reactor vessel. It is noted that a high flow rate of the integral reactor is quite smaller compared to a flow rate required in the commercial loop type reactor.

Although the absolute amount of safety injection is greatly different from the integral reactor, a loop type reactor in the related art also requires various safety injection characteristics from the case of rapidly supplying a lot of fluid at the initial stage of an accident to the case of continuously supplying a small amount of fluid at the last stage of an accident. A nitrogen pressurized safety injection tank in the related art is typically designed to quickly inject a high flow rate of coolant in a safe manner when the internal pressure of the reactor vessel is rapidly decreased, and thus mostly used as a facility for coping with a large break loss of coolant accident. Furthermore, a core makeup tank in the related art is designed to implement safety injection with one injection characteristic due to a gravitational head of water subsequent to making a pressure balance between the reactor vessel and the core makeup tank, and mostly used for the purpose of injecting emergency boric acid solution at a relatively high pressure when a non-loss of coolant accident occurs. As described above, various safety injection characteristics cannot be satisfied with a single type of safety tank, and thus various type systems are used in a complicated manner to meet the required characteristics of safety injection in an individual reactor during an accident.

For instance, i) a pressure balance core makeup tank (safety injection at high pressure), a pressurized safety injection tank (safety injection at medium pressure), an in-containment refuelling water storage tank (safety injection at low pressure), and the like are used in a complicated manner in a passive safety system of the passive pressurized water reactors such as AP600, AP1000 and the like, and ii) a pressurized safety injection tank (safety injection at medium pressure), a high-pressure safety injection pump, a low-pressure safety injection pump, and the like are used in a complicated manner in an active safety system.

Accordingly, it is required to develop a device for simplifying safety injection facilities that have been configured in a complicated manner according to the required characteristic of safety injection into the reactor to effectively inject coolant.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

An aspect of the present disclosure is to simplify a safety injection facility that has been configured in a complicated manner.

Another aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a safety injection facility in which a flow rate of coolant injection is varied according to the required characteristic of safety injection into the reactor when an accident occurs.

In order to accomplish the foregoing aspects, a multi stage safety injection device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure may include a safety injection tank formed to contain coolant to be injected into a reactor vessel by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased, a pressure balance line connected to the reactor vessel and safety injection tank to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, a safety injection line connected to a lower end portion of the safety injection tank and the reactor vessel to inject coolant to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, and a flow control line extended from the safety injection line to an inner portion of the safety injection tank, and provided with safety injection ports into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.

According to an example associated with the present disclosure, the safety injection ports may form a predetermined flow resistance to decrease the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel through the flow control line and the safety injection line step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.

It is based on a principle in which a flow resistance of total summed passages decreases in case of safety injection with two summed safety injection ports than that with only one safety injection port, and further decreases in case of three summed safety injection ports than that with two summed safety injection ports.

According to another example associated with the present disclosure, the safety injection port may include a first safety injection port formed at a lower end portion of the flow control line to continuously provide an injection passage for coolant filled within the safety injection tank is injected into the reactor vessel, and at least one second safety injection port formed at a predetermined height from the first safety injection port to provide an injection passage for coolant until the water level of the safety injection tank becomes lower than a predetermined water level.

According to another example associated with the present disclosure, the multi stage safety injection device may further include a plurality of orifices installed at each safety injection port to adjust the flow rate of coolant that has passed any one safety injection port prior to being merged with coolant that has passed another safety injection port, and configured to form a predetermined flow resistance for the safety injection ports, respectively, in order to implement the injection of coolant step by step according to the required characteristics of safety injection in a reactor.

According to another example associated with the present disclosure, the multi stage safety injection device may further include an isolation valve installed at the pressure balance line to block fluid from being injected from the reactor vessel into the safety injection tank during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs.

According to another example associated with the present disclosure, the multi stage safety injection device may further include an isolation valve installed at the safety injection line to block the flowing of coolant from the safety injection tank to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state with the reactor vessel during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection from the safety injection tank to the reactor vessel when an accident occurs.

Furthermore, in order to implement the forgoing task, according to the present disclosure, there is disclosed a passive safety injection system. The passive safety injection system may include a core makeup tank connected to a reactor vessel to maintain a pressure balance state with the reactor vessel and inject coolant to the reactor vessel when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased, and a multi stage safety injection device connected to the reactor vessel to inject coolant step by step to the reactor vessel at a pressure lower than that of the core makeup tank after the injection of the core makeup tank, wherein the multi stage safety injection device includes a safety injection tank formed to contain coolant to be injected into a reactor vessel by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased, a pressure balance line connected to the reactor vessel and safety injection tank to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, a safety injection line connected to a lower end portion of the safety injection tank and the reactor vessel to inject coolant to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank, and a flow control line extended from the safety injection line to an inner portion of the safety injection tank, and provided with safety injection ports into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.

According to an example associated with the present disclosure, the multi stage safety injection device may further include an isolation valve installed at the pressure balance line to block fluid from being injected from the reactor vessel into the safety injection tank during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a conceptual view illustrating a multi stage safety injection device associated with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a conceptual view illustrating the normal plant operation state of an integral reactor installed with a multi stage safety injection device illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a conceptual view illustrating the operation of a safety facility when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the integral reactor illustrated in FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a conceptual view illustrating the pressure balance step when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the multi stage safety injection device illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (medium flow rate of injection step) in a multi stage safety injection device subsequent to FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (low flow rate of injection step) in a multi stage safety injection device subsequent to FIG. 5;

FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating an injection flow rate of coolant in time in a multi stage safety injection device and core makeup tank described in FIGS. 1 through 6;

FIG. 8 is a conceptual view illustrating a multi stage safety injection device associated with another embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 9 is a conceptual view illustrating the normal plant operation state of an integral reactor installed with a multi stage safety injection device illustrated in FIG. 8;

FIG. 10 is a conceptual view illustrating the operation of a safety facility when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the integral reactor illustrated in FIG. 9;

FIG. 11 is a conceptual view illustrating the pressure balance step when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the multi stage safety injection device illustrated in FIG. 8;

FIG. 12 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (high flow rate of injection step) in a multi stage safety injection device subsequent to FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (medium flow rate of injection step) in a multi stage safety injection device subsequent to FIG. 12;

FIG. 14 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (low flow rate of injection step) in a multi stage safety injection device subsequent to FIG. 13; and

FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an injection flow rate of coolant in time in a multi stage safety injection device described in FIGS. 8 through 14.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Hereinafter, a multi stage safety injection device associated with the present disclosure and a passive safety injection system having the same will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Even in different embodiments according to the present disclosure, the same or similar reference numerals are designated to the same or similar configurations, and the description thereof will be substituted by the earlier description. Unless clearly mentioned otherwise, expressions in the singular number used in the present disclosure may include a plural meaning.

FIGS. 1 through 7 are views illustrating a multi stage safety injection device associated with an embodiment of the present disclosure, and FIGS. 8 through 15 are views illustrating a multi stage safety injection device associated with another embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1 is a conceptual view illustrating a multi stage safety injection device 100 associated with an embodiment of the present disclosure.

The multi stage safety injection device 100 is connected to a reactor vessel 12, and formed to inject coolant to the reactor vessel 12 using a passive force when a loss of coolant accident occurs due to a break such as line fracture. However, the injection flow rate of coolant required according to the passage of time subsequent to an accident may not be constant, and thus the multi stage safety injection device 100 is designed to convert the flow rate of coolant being injected according to the passage of time.

The multi stage safety injection device 100 may include a safety injection tank 110, a pressure balance line 120, a safety injection line 130 and a flow control line 140.

The safety injection tank 110 is formed to contain coolant therein. Coolant stored within the safety injection tank 110 is injected from the safety injection tank 110 to the reactor vessel 12 due to a gravitational head of water when a loss of coolant accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel 12 is decreased. Gravitational head of water, as a water head determined by a location in the gravitational field, is energy formed by the safety injection tank 110 disposed at a higher location than that of the reactor vessel 12. Accordingly, coolant injection from the safety injection tank 110 to the reactor vessel 12 is carried out due to a gravitational head of water which is passive energy, and thus additional energy is not needed to be supplied from the outside. A space excluding coolant within the safety injection tank 110 is filled with a gas (typically, nitrogen is used).

The pressure balance line (reactor pressure balance pipe) 120 is connected to the reactor vessel 12 and safety injection tank 110 to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel 12 and safety injection tank 110. When the pressure balance line 120 is open, fluid (coolant, steam, ideal fluid, etc.) moves from the reactor vessel 12 having a relatively high pressure to the safety injection tank 110, and thus the reactor vessel 12 and safety injection tank 110 makes a pressure balance to each other. Coolant injection from the safety injection tank 110 to the reactor vessel 12 is carried out due to a gravitational head of water, and thus a pressure balance between the safety injection tank 110 and reactor vessel 12 should be first formed to inject coolant. An orifice (not shown) may be installed in the pressure balance line 120 to adjust a flow rate of fluid being injected from the reactor vessel 12 into the safety injection tank 110.

An isolation valve 121 may be provided in the pressure balance line 120. The isolation valve 121 provided in the pressure balance line 120 is in a closed state during a normal plant operation to block fluid from being injected from the reactor vessel 12 into the safety injection tank 110. Accordingly, during a normal plant operation, the reactor vessel 12 and safety injection tank 110 maintains an isolated state due to the isolation valve 121, and thus the pressure thereof is not in a balanced state.

The isolation valve 121 is open by a control signal of the relevant system generated from the pressure or water level reduction of the reactor vessel when an accident occurs in a reactor. When fluid is injected from the reactor vessel 12 into the safety injection tank 110 to form the pressure balance state between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110, coolant injection due to a gravitational head of water is started from the safety injection tank 110.

When a single isolation valve 121 is installed therein, the entire multi stage safety injection device 100 may not be operated due to a failure of the isolation valve 121, and therefore, a plurality of isolation valves 121 may be installed in a plurality of branch lines 121 operating independently from each other, respectively, as illustrated in the drawing. Furthermore, the isolation valve 121 installed in the pressure balance line 120 may be open by a control signal generated from the pressure, temperature change and the like of the reactor vessel 12, and the isolation valve 121 is designed to receive power backup using a battery or the like to be prepared for a loss of alternating current (AC) power.

When the isolation valve 121 is installed in the pressure balance line 120, a pressure between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110 is balanced only when the isolation valve 121 is open, and the check valve 131 is maintained with a closed state due to the pressure of the reactor vessel 12 higher than that of the safety injection tank 110. Therefore coolant is not injected into the reactor vessel 12 from the safety injection tank 110 unless the isolation valve 121 is open, even when an additional isolation valve (not shown) is not installed in the safety injection line 130.

The safety injection line 130 is connected to the safety injection tank 110 and reactor vessel 12 to inject coolant within the safety injection tank 110 into the reactor vessel 12. When a pressure between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110 is balanced due to the open of the pressure balance line 120, coolant filled within the safety injection tank 110 is injected into the reactor vessel 12 through the safety injection line 130.

The flow control line 140 is extended and formed from the safety injection line 130 to an inner portion of the safety injection tank 110. The flow control line 140 provides an injection passage for coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12. As illustrated in the drawing, the flow control line 140 may be installed in perpendicular to an inner portion of the safety injection tank 110, but the shape of the flow control line 140 may not be necessarily limited to this.

The flow control line 140 may include safety injection ports 141 into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to decrease the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 110. Coolant is injected into the flow control line 140 through the safety injection port 141, and passed through the safety injection line 130 connected to the flow control line 140 and injected into the reactor vessel 12. (Hereinafter, coolant injection through the safety injection port 141 or safety injection through safety injection port 141 refers to coolant within the safety injection tank 110 being injected into the flow control line 140 through the safety injection port 141 and then injected into the reactor vessel 12 through the safety injection line 130 unless clearly used otherwise in the present disclosure).

The safety injection port 141 may include a first safety injection port 141 a and a second safety injection port 141 b. The first safety injection port 141 a is formed at a lower end portion of the flow control line to continuously provide an injection passage for coolant until almost of the coolant within the safety injection tank 12 is injected into the reactor vessel 12. The second safety injection port 141 b is formed at a location 141 b′ which is a predetermined height from the first safety injection port 141 a to provide an injection passage for coolant until the water level of the safety injection tank 110 becomes lower than a predetermined water level 141 b′. The number of safety injection ports 141, a size of the flow resistance, and a height difference between each safety injection port 141 may be varied according to the required characteristics of safety injection of an individual plant.

Coolant injected into the flow control line 140 through the second safety injection port 141 b is merged with coolant injected into the flow control line 140 through the first safety injection port 141 a. The merged coolant is passed through the safety injection line 130 and injected into the reactor vessel 12.

When the injection of coolant into reactor vessel 12 from the safety injection tank 110 is started, coolant is injected into the flow control line 140 through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b to implement the injection of coolant at first, but when the water level of coolant is lower than the height 141 b′ of the second safety injection port 141 b, coolant is no more injected into the second safety injection port 141 b. Accordingly, coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 is injected into the flow control line 140 only through the first safety injection port 141 a, and then injected into the reactor vessel 12 through the safety injection line 130. When the water level of the safety injection tank 110 is lower than the height of the second safety injection port 141 b, the entire flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 decreases as much as the flow rate of coolant that has been injected through the second safety injection port 141 b and injected into the reactor vessel 12. A decrease of flow rate while implementing safety injection with only the first safety injection port 141 a is resulting from a sudden increase in total flow resistance of the flow control line 140 and safety injection line 130.

Even when coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b, a water head difference decreases as decreasing the water level within the safety injection tank 110, and thus the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 decreases to a certain extent according to the passage of time. Similarly, even when the safety injection of coolant is carried out only by the first safety injection port 141 a, a flow rate of coolant injection gradually decreases according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 110. However, a decrease speed of an injection flow rate in case where coolant is injected only through the first safety injection port 141 a is slower than that in case where coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b. It is because the injection flow rate of coolant itself in the former case is less than that in the latter case.

At a moment when the injection of coolant and safety injection therethrough is no more carried out through the second safety injection port 141 b due to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 110, the flow rate of coolant being injected into the reactor vessel 12 instantaneously decreases at a fast rate. It is because one injection passage of coolant is removed in addition to a simple reduction of its water head difference.

A check valve 131 may be installed in the safety injection line 130. The check valve 131 is a device for blocking coolant from flowing backward from the reactor vessel 12 at a relatively high pressure to the safety injection tank 110 during a normal plant operation of the reactor. The check valve 131 is open by a gravitational head of water when coolant is injected from the safety injection tank 110 to the reactor vessel 12 due to the occurrence of an accident in a reactor.

The design pressure of the safety injection tank 110 is determined by a pressure making a balance to the reactor vessel 12. When the isolation valve 121 is installed in the pressure balance line 120 and the check valve 131 is installed in the safety injection line 130 c, a pressure between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110 does not form a balance prior to the isolation valve 121 being open during an accident, and thus the design pressure of the safety injection tank 110 may be applied to be lower than that of the reactor vessel 12.

An orifice (not shown) may be installed to adjust the flow rate of coolant at each of the safety injection ports 141 a, 141 b. The orifice adjusts the flow rate of coolant that has passed through any one safety injection port 141 a, 141 b prior to being merged with coolant that has passed through the other safety injection port 141 a, 141 b. The orifice forms a suitable flow resistance for each of the safety injection ports 141 a, 141 b to implement a suitable injection of coolant step by step according to the required characteristic of an individual reactor.

As illustrated in the drawing, when the second safety injection port 141 b is formed at a higher location than that of the first safety injection port 141 a, the orifice (not shown) forms a relatively small total flow resistance in case where coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b at the same time, compared to a case where coolant is injected only through the first safety injection port 141 a, thereby allowing a relatively higher flow rate of coolant to flow through the safety injection line 130 according to the required characteristic of the reactor.

Accordingly, the flow rate in case where coolant is injected to the flow control line 140 only through the first safety injection port 141 a to implement safety injection is smaller than that in case where coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b at the same time. The reason of setting the injection flow rate of coolant as described above is to increase an injection time in case of performing a relatively low flow rate of safety injection, thereby performing safety injection for a long period of time (more than about 72 hours in case of a passive safety injection system).

The safety injection ports 141 a, 141 b formed at different heights from each other are connected to flow control line 140, and thus when the water level within the safety injection tank 110 is reduced (lower than 140 b′), coolant is no more injected through the second safety injection port 141 b formed at a higher location. Accordingly, for the multi stage safety injection device 100, safety injection from the safety injection tank 110 to the reactor vessel 12 may be carried out with multiple stages such as a first stage by means of the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b and a second stage by means of only the first safety injection port 141 a. Furthermore, a size of the safety injection tank 110, a height of the safety injection port 141, and a flow resistance of the orifice are set according to the characteristics of safety injection required by an individual reactor, thereby injecting coolant in a continuous and successive manner for a long period of time required by an individual reactor.

Safety injection facilities in the related art that have been configured in a complicated manner has a problem such as a delay or overlap of time for making a pressure balance for each safety injection tank during the process of performing the switching of safety injection flow rates, but according to a multi stage safety injection device 100 presented in the present disclosure, the flow rate switching of coolant is successively carried out in a state that a pressure balance is made between the safety injection tank 110 and the reactor vessel 12, thus not causing a problem such as a delay or overlap of time during the flow rate switching subsequent to starting the operation of the safety injection tank 110. Furthermore, the multi stage safety injection device 100 is a passive safety injection system, thereby enhancing the reliability and stability compared to an active safety injection system.

Hereinafter, the operation of a multi stage safety injection device installed in an integral reactor and other system arrangements during a normal plant operation or the occurrence of an accident will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 through 6.

FIG. 2 is a conceptual view illustrating the normal plant operation state of an integral reactor 10 installed with a multi stage safety injection device 100 illustrated in FIG. 1.

For the integral reactor 10, the reactor vessel 12 is disposed within a containment building (or containment, safeguard vessel) 11. For the integral reactor 10, main components such as reactor coolant pumps 12 a, a pressurizer 12 b, steam generators 12 c, and the like are installed within the reactor vessel 12 as described above.

Water is supplied to the steam generator 12 c through a feedwater line 13 a from the feedwater system 13 located out of the containment building 11, and water receives energy from nuclear fission produced in the core 12 d to become high temperature and high pressure steam, and moves to a turbine system 14 located out of the containment building 11 through a steam line 14 a. During a normal plant operation of the integral reactor 10, isolation valves 13 b, 14 b installed in the feedwater line 13 a and steam line 14 a are in an open state.

A passive residual heat removal system 15 is installed out of the containment building 11, and connected to the steam line 14 a and feedwater line 13 a to remove heat from the reactor vessel 12 when an accident occurs. However, during a normal plant operation of the integral reactor 10, an isolation valve 15 a is maintained in a closed state.

An automatic depressurization system 16 is installed within the containment building 11, and connected to the reactor vessel 12 to reduce a pressure of the reactor vessel 12 when an accident occurs. However, in the automatic depressurization system 16, the automatic depressurization valves 16 a are also maintained in a closed state during a normal plant operation of the integral reactor 10 similarly to the passive residual heat removal system 15.

A passive safety injection system 200 is installed within the containment building 11, and connected to the reactor vessel 12 to inject coolant into reactor vessel 12. The passive safety injection system 200 may include the multi stage safety injection device 100 and core makeup tank 210, and both isolation valves 121, 211 are maintained in a closed state during a normal plant operation of the integral reactor 10.

During a normal plant operation of the integral reactor 10, a containment building isolation valve 17 using for normal plant operation is in an open state, and the passive safety injection system 200, passive residual heat removal system 15 and automatic depressurization system 16 do not operate.

FIG. 3 is a conceptual view illustrating the operation of a safety facility when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the integral reactor 10 illustrated in FIG. 2.

When a loss of coolant accident such as line fracture or the like occurs in which coolant is discharged and thus the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel 12 is decreased, the containment building isolation valve 17 is closed, and the isolation valve 13 b installed in the feedwater line 13 a and the isolation valve 14 b installed in the steam line 14 a are also closed by a control signal of the relevant system to stop the operation of the feedwater system 13 and turbine system 14.

The isolation valve 15 a of the passive residual heat removal system 15 is open by the relevant control signal. Coolant within the condensation heat exchanger 15 e is injected into the feedwater line 13 a through the check valve 15 b and orifice 15 c to transfer residual heat from the reactor vessel 12, and returned to the steam line 14 a to remove residual heat using the condensation heat exchanger 15 e. Heat transferred to the emergency cooling tank 15 d through the condensation heat exchanger 15 e is discharged to an external atmospheric environment while evaporating the coolant of the emergency cooling tank 15 d.

Similarly, the automatic depressurization valves 16 a of the automatic depressurization system 16 are open by the relevant control signal to reduce a pressure of the reactor vessel 12, thereby smoothly performing safety injection from the passive safety injection system 200.

The core makeup tank 210 is connected to the reactor vessel 12 by the pressure balance line 120 to maintain a pressure balance state with the reactor vessel 12, and connected to the reactor vessel 12 by the safety injection line 130 c to inject coolant to the reactor vessel 12 when an accident occurs. Accordingly, the core makeup tank 210 is connected to the reactor vessel 12 by the pressure balance line 120 and safety injection line 130 c, but the function of each line is totally different. A portion for connecting the reactor vessel 12 and core makeup tank 210 from the pressure balance line 120 is open all the time, and thus the reactor vessel 12 and core makeup tank 210 maintain a pressure balance state. Accordingly, the design pressure of the core makeup tank 210 is high at a level of the reactor vessel 12.

The isolation valve 211 installed between the core makeup tank 210 and safety injection line 130 c is open by a control signal generated from a pressure or temperature change of the reactor vessel 12, and pressure balance type safety injection due to the water level of the core makeup tank 210 is started into the reactor vessel 12. Coolant is passed through the isolation valve 211, check valve 212 and orifice 213 and injected into the reactor vessel 12, and the flow rate at this time is suitably established to a predetermined flow rate by the orifice 213. Safety injection due to the core makeup tank 210 is designed to be operated at the early stage of the accident, and thus it is safety injection with a relatively high flow rate compared to that of the multi stage safety injection device 100 which will be described later.

When the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel 12 is further decreased and reached to a predetermined value due to cooling of the reactor vessel 12, and discharging from the fractured portion and the like, a control signal is generated from the relevant system to open the isolation valve 121 installed in the pressure balance line 120, thereby forming a pressure balance between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110. The isolation valve 121 installed in the pressure balance line 120 is designed to be open subsequent to the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel being reduced to a certain extent, and thus the design pressure of the safety injection tank 110 is applied to be lower than that of the core makeup tank 210, and the coolant injection into the reactor vessel 12 is also carried out at a pressure lower than that of the core makeup tank 210.

Referring to FIG. 1, the injection of coolant due to the multi stage safety injection device 100 may be divided into two stages. When coolant injection due to the core makeup tank 210 is set to as a high flow rate of safety injection, coolant injection due to the multi stage safety injection device 100 may be carried out with two stages at a pressure lower than that of the core makeup tank 210, and thus each stage can be divided into a medium flow rate of safety injection and a low flow rate of safety injection. The medium flow rate of safety injection is carried out through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b of the multi stage safety injection device 100 at a pressure condition lower than that of the high flow rate of safety injection of the core makeup tank 210, and the low flow rate of safety injection is carried out through the first safety injection port 141 a from a time point at which the coolant level of the safety injection tank 110 is decreased than that of the installation location of the second safety injection port 141 b.

A high flow rate of safety injection due to the core makeup tank 210 and a medium and low flow rate of safety injection due to the multi stage safety injection device 100 may denote relative flow rates, respectively, and each flow rate may be set according to the safety injection characteristics required an individual reactor.

The reason of requiring multi stage safety injection from a high to a low flow rate is due to the accident characteristics of the reactor. In particular, for the integral reactor 10, the water level of the core relatively fast decreases at the initial stage of accident occurrence, and thus a high flow rate of coolant is required to be rapidly injected. The passive safety injection system 200 implements a high flow rate of safety injection by the core makeup tank 210.

Subsequent to the occurrence of an accident, the internal pressure of the reactor vessel is still high with a relatively high coolant discharge flow rate from the early to middle stages of the accident, but the pressure of the reactor decreases with a relatively low coolant discharge flow rate from the middle to late stages of the accident, and thus a medium and a low flow rate of safety injection are required, respectively. For the passive safety injection system 200, a medium and a low flow rate of safety injection are carried out step by step by the multi stage safety injection device 100.

Referring to FIG. 3, the inside of the core makeup tank 210 is vacant and thus a high flow rate of safety injection due to the core makeup tank 210 has been previously completed. The coolant level within the safety injection tank 110 is positioned below the height of the second safety injection port 141 b, and thus it is seen that a medium flow rate of safety injection has been completed, and a lower flow rate of safety injection is carried out only through the first safety injection port 141 a.

Hereinafter, a medium and a low flow rate of safety injection processes by means of the multi stage safety injection device 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 through 6.

FIG. 4 is a conceptual view illustrating the pressure balance step when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the multi stage safety injection device 100 illustrated in FIG. 1.

When the isolation valve 121 installed in the pressure balance line 120 is open by a control signal, fluid is injected from the reactor vessel 12 to the safety injection tank 110 through the pressure balance line 120. The multi stage safety injection device 100 is a safety facility using a pressure balance method between the reactor vessel 12 and the safety injection tank 110, and therefore, a pressure balance should be formed between the safety injection tank 110 and the reactor vessel 12 before to start coolant injection from the safety injection tank 110.

When fluid is injected from the reactor vessel 12, an upper portion within the safety injection tank 110 is filled with nitrogen gas that has been filled therein in advance and the fluid. Fluid at a high temperature is injected from the reactor to the safety injection tank at a low temperature, and thus a slight time delay may be observed until the pressure varies while condensing steam to start safety injection at the initial stage of the introduction. Then, a pressure between the reactor vessel 12 and safety injection tank 110 is gradually balanced according to the introduction of fluid, and the opening of the check valve 131 installed in the safety injection line 130 and safety injection are started by a gravitational head of water of the safety injection tank 110.

FIG. 5 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (medium flow rate of injection step) in the multi stage safety injection device 100 subsequent to FIG. 4.

When safety injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device 100 is started, a medium flow rate of safety injection is carried out through the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b until the water level of the safety injection tank 110 becomes lower than the second safety injection port 141 b.

When an orifice (not shown) is installed in the first safety injection port 141 a, the orifice installed in the first safety injection port 141 a is configured to inject a flow rate of coolant according to the characteristics of the reactor required when coolant is injected in a single mode. Similarly, when an orifice (not shown) is installed in the second safety injection port 141 b, the orifice installed in the second safety injection port 141 b is configured to inject a suitable flow rate of coolant according to the characteristics of the reactor required when coolant is injected through both of the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b.

A gravitational head of water is gradually decreased by the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 110 even while implementing a medium flow rate of safety injection by means of the first safety injection port 141 a and second safety injection port 141 b, and the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 is gradually reduced. The flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 is only gradually decreased but not instantaneously and rapidly reduced until the water level of the safety injection tank 110 is decreased lower than the height 141 b′ of the second safety injection port 141 b. However, when the water level of the safety injection tank 110 is reduced lower than the height 141 b′ of the second safety injection port 141 b, the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 is instantaneously and rapidly decreased. It is because when the second safety injection port 141 b is exposed due to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 110, the safety injection tank 110 and flow control line 140 maintains the same water level by gravity and thus coolant is no more injected through the second safety injection port 141 b.

FIG. 6 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (low flow rate of injection step) in the multi stage safety injection device 100 subsequent to FIG. 5.

Since the water level of the safety injection tank 110 is decreased lower than the height 141 b′ of the second safety injection port 141 b, the injection of coolant is no more carried out through the second safety injection port 141 b, but a low flow rate of safety injection is carried out only through the first safety injection port 141 a.

When an orifice (not shown) is installed in the first safety injection port 141 a, a flow resistance is formed by the orifice, and thus the amount of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 12 may be adjusted to a low flow rate by the orifice. According to the progress of a low flow rate of safety injection, the water level of coolant in the safety injection tank 110 is gradually decreased, and a gravitational head of water thereof is gradually decreased but not instantaneously and rapidly decreased, as the amount of coolant injected through the first safety injection port 141 a is relatively small, and thus the speed of decreasing a gravitational head of water and the speed of reducing an injection flow rate of coolant are very slow.

A low flow rate of safety injection may continue until almost of the coolant within the safety injection tank 110 is injected into the reactor vessel 12, and be maintained up to a time point (about 72 hours) that requires safety injection without operator's action or emergency AC power in a passive reactor.

Hereinafter, a change of flow rate of safety injection in time by means of the multi stage safety injection device 100 and core makeup tank 210 illustrated in FIGS. 1 through 6 will be described with reference to FIG. 7.

FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating an injection flow rate of coolant in time in the multi stage safety injection device 100 and core makeup tank 210 described in FIGS. 1 through 6.

The horizontal axis denotes a flow of time from a moment at which a loss of coolant accident or the like occurs, and the vertical axis denotes a flow rate of coolant injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device and core makeup tank.

At the early stage of an accident, the water level of the core in a reactor vessel is relatively rapidly decreased, and thus a high flow rate of safety injection is carried out using the core makeup tank. The flow rate is gradually decreased due to a decrease of head of water of the core makeup tank even while implementing a high flow rate of safety injection.

A medium and a low flow rate of safety injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device are carried out subsequent to the early stage of an accident. The operation and injection time of the core makeup tank and multi stage safety injection device are varied according to the accident condition of a reactor, and thus a delay of safety injection start time of the multi stage safety injection device or a coolant injection overlap phenomenon of the core makeup tank and multi stage safety injection device in a pressure balance state subsequent to the actuation of the multi stage safety injection device is an unavoidable physical phenomenon. However, when flow rate switching, that is the medium flow rate to the low flow rate, is carried out within the multi stage safety injection device, the overlap or delay of coolant injection does not occur as illustrated in the drawing.

When a medium flow rate of safety injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device is started and a high flow rate of safety injection by means of the core makeup tank is stopped, the flow rate of safety injection is instantaneously decreased. Subsequently, the flow rate of coolant injection is gradually decreased due to a decrease of head of water while implementing a medium flow rate of safety injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device.

When the water level of the safety injection tank is decreased lower than the installation height of the second safety injection line, a flow rate of coolant injection is instantaneously and rapidly decreased to implement a low flow rate of safety injection. The reduction of flow rate continues even while implementing a low flow rate of safety injection, but the reduction speed is very slow and continual safety injection is carried out to maintain it for a period of time required by the reactor.

As described above, a multi stage safety injection device according to the present disclosure may be formed to decrease a flow rate of coolant injection step by step according to the required safety injection characteristics of a reactor, thereby injecting coolant for a long period of time.

Hereinafter, a multi stage safety injection device associated with another embodiment of the present disclosure will be described with reference to FIGS. 8 through 15. The redundant description previously illustrated in FIGS. 1 through 7 will be substituted by the earlier description.

FIG. 8 is a conceptual view illustrating the multi stage safety injection device 300 associated with another embodiment of the present disclosure.

The multi stage safety injection device 300 is formed to inject coolant into the reactor vessel 22 when an accident occurs, and may include a safety injection tank 310, a pressure balance line 320, a safety injection line 330 and a flow control line 340.

The safety injection tank 310 is formed to contain coolant to be injected into the reactor vessel 22 when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel 22 is decreased. The safety injection tank 310 is all filled with coolant (boric acid solution).

The pressure balance line 320 is connected to the reactor vessel 22 and safety injection tank 310 to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel 22 and the safety injection tank 310. It is different from the multi stage safety injection device 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 in that an isolation valve is not installed in the pressure balance line 320. Accordingly, the pressure balance line 320 is always maintained in an open state, and when the pressure of the reactor vessel 22 is changed not only when an accident occurs but also during a normal plant operation, fluid is injected from the reactor vessel 22 to the safety injection tank 310 to maintain a pressure balance within a short period of time. For the pressure balance line 320, an orifice (not shown) may be installed to limit a flow rate of fluid injected from the reactor vessel 22 according to the design characteristics.

When a pressure balance between the reactor vessel 22 and the safety injection tank 310 is maintained as described above, the design pressure of the safety injection tank 310 should be designed to be high at a level of the reactor vessel 22.

The safety injection line 330 is connected to the safety injection tank 310 and reactor vessel 22 to inject coolant into the reactor vessel 22 in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel 22 and the safety injection tank 310 in an accident.

A flow control line 340 is extended and formed from the safety injection line 330 to an inner portion of the safety injection tank 310, and provided with at least two safety injection port 341 at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce a flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 22 step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank 310.

As illustrated in FIG. 8, the safety injection port 341 may include a plurality of safety injection ports, such as a first safety injection port 341 a formed at a lower end portion of the flow control line 340, a second safety injection port 341 b formed at a location of the flow control line 340 which is a predetermined height from the first safety injection port 341 a, and a third safety injection port 341 c formed at a location of the flow control line 340 which is a predetermined height from the second safety injection port 341 b.

As coolant is injected into the reactor vessel 22 from the safety injection tank 310 when an accident occurs, the water level of the safety injection tank 310 is gradually decreased. When coolant injection is first started, coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 341 a, second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c. When the coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is lower than the height 341 c′ of the third safety injection port 341 c as implementing coolant injection, coolant is no more injected through to the third safety injection port 341 c, and coolant is injected only through the first safety injection port 341 a and second safety injection port 341 b. Then, when coolant is started not to be injected through to the third safety injection port 341 c, the injection flow rate of coolant is instantaneously and rapidly decreased.

When the water level of the safety injection tank 310 is lower than the installation height of the second safety injection port 341 b as further implementing coolant injection, coolant is no more injected through to the second safety injection port 341 b, and coolant is injected only through the first safety injection port 341 a. Similarly, when coolant is started not to be injected through to the second safety injection port 341 b, the injection flow rate of coolant is instantaneously and rapidly decreased.

An injection flow rate in case where coolant is injected through all the first safety injection port 341 a, second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c may be referred to as a high flow rate of safety injection, and an injection flow rate in case where coolant is injected through the first safety injection port 341 a and second safety injection port 341 b as a medium flow rate of safety injection, and an injection flow rate in case where coolant is injected only through the first safety injection port 341 a as a low flow rate of safety injection. A high, a medium and a low flow rate are relative values, respectively, and may be differently designed according to a size of the safety injection tank 310, a height of the safety injection ports 341, and a flow resistance of each of the safety injection ports 341.

The reason of forming different flow resistances is to provide a high, medium and low flow rate stages of safety injection and different periods of time required for coolant injection. A relatively high flow rate of coolant should be rapidly injected when an accident occurs whereas a relatively low flow rate of coolant is required to be injected for a long period of time at the middle and late stages of the accident.

The multi stage safety injection device 300 is configured to form a different flow resistance by each of the safety injection ports 341 or an orifice (not shown) installed in each of the safety injection ports 341 and, and thus designed to adjust the injection flow rate and injection time of coolant required for a flow of time subsequent to the occurrence of an accident in a reactor.

An isolation valve 332 is provided in the safety injection line 330. The isolation valve 332 is maintained in a closed state in a normal plant operation to block coolant from being injected from the safety injection tank 310 into the reactor vessel 22. The isolation valve 332 is open by a control signal of the relevant system when an accident occurs. The reactor vessel 22 and safety injection tank 310 have been in a pressure balance state, and thus coolant injection is started from the safety injection tank 310 along with the opening of the isolation valve 332.

The isolation valve 332 may be designed to receive backup by a battery or the like to be prepared for an emergency loss of alternating current power, and a plurality of isolation valves 332 may be installed for a plurality of branch lines 333, respectively, to prevent the operation of the entire multi stage safety injection device 300 from being stopped due to a single failure of the isolation valve.

FIG. 9 is a conceptual view illustrating the normal plant operation state of an integral reactor installed with the multi stage safety injection device 300 illustrated in FIG. 8.

The multi stage safety injection device 300 is installed within a containment building 21 of the integral reactor 20, and connected to the reactor vessel 22 by the pressure balance line 320 and safety injection line 330. The safety injection tank 310, composed of multi trains generally, is installed at a location higher than that of the reactor vessel 22 for coolant injection due to a gravitational head of water. During a normal plant operation, an isolation valve is in a closed state in the multi stage safety injection device 300.

The integral reactor 20 illustrated in FIG. 9 is different from the integral reactor 10 illustrated in FIG. 2 in that the core makeup tank does not exist, and the safety injection port 341 c of the multi stage safety injection device 300 is added to replace the role of the core makeup tank, and the isolation valve 332 is installed in the safety injection line 330 other than the pressure balance line 320.

The safety injection tank 310 is connected to the reactor vessel 22 through the pressure balance line 320, and the pressure balance line 320 is always open, the design pressure of the safety injection tank 310 is high at a level of the reactor vessel 22. Accordingly, the safety injection tank 310 designed with a high pressure is in charge of the function of the core makeup tank that has injected a high flow rate of coolant to the reactor vessel 22 when an accident occurs in FIG. 2. Three safety injection ports 341 are installed in the flow control line 340 for a high, a medium and a low flow rate of multi stage safety injections.

FIG. 10 is a conceptual view illustrating the operation of a safety facility when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the integral reactor 20 illustrated in FIG. 9.

When a loss of coolant accident such as line fracture 27a or the like occurs and the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel 22 is reduced, the isolation valve 332 installed in the safety injection line 330 is open by a control signal of the relevant system, and safety injection is started from the multi stage safety injection device 300 into the reactor vessel 22.

The coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is between the second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c in FIG. 10, and thus coolant is no more injected through the third safety injection port 341 c, and it is seen that a high flow rate of safety injection stage has been already finished. Safety injection is carried out through the first safety injection port 341 a and second safety injection port 341 b, and therefore, FIG. 10 illustrates a medium flow rate of safety injection stage.

FIG. 11 is a conceptual view illustrating the pressure balance step when a loss of coolant accident occurs in the multi stage safety injection device 300 illustrated in FIG. 8.

When a control signal is generated by the relevant system when an accident occurs, the isolation valve 332 installed in the safety injection line 330 is open by the control signal, and the safety injection of coolant due to a gravitational head of water is started. Fluid is injected from the reactor vessel 22 into the safety injection tank 310 through the pressure balance line 320, and thus the reactor vessel 22 and safety injection tank 310 maintains a pressure balance state.

FIG. 12 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (high flow rate of injection step) in the multi stage safety injection device 300 subsequent to FIG. 11.

At the initial stage of an accident, coolant within the safety injection tank 310 is injected into the reactor vessel 22 through the first safety injection port 341 a, second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c. Total flow resistance decreases in the case of injecting coolant through three passages of the first safety injection port 341 a, second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c compared to the case of injecting coolant through only one passage of the first safety injection port 341 a, and therefore, a high flow rate of coolant is injected into the reactor vessel 22 when an accident occurs.

A gravitational head of water is gradually decreased by the water level reduction of coolant until the coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is decreased lower than the height 341 c′ of the third safety injection port 341 c, and therefore a flow rate of coolant injection is gradually reduced. Then, a flow rate of coolant injection is instantaneously and rapidly reduced at a moment at which the coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is decreased lower than the height 341 c′ of the third safety injection port 341 c.

FIG. 13 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (medium flow rate of injection step) in the multi stage safety injection device 300 subsequent to FIG. 12.

The coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is decreased lower than the height 341 c′ of the third safety injection port 341 c, and therefore coolant is not injected into the third safety injection port 341 c, but a medium flow rate of safety injection is carried out through the first safety injection port 341 a and second safety injection port 341 b.

The coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is continuously decreased while implementing a medium flow rate of safety injection, and the amount of coolant injection from the safety injection tank 310 into the reactor vessel 22 is gradually decreased. At a moment at which the coolant level of the safety injection tank 310 is decreased lower than the height 341 b′ of the second safety injection port 341 b, coolant is no more injected through into the second safety injection port 341 b and a flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel 22 is instantaneously and rapidly reduced.

FIG. 14 is a conceptual view illustrating a coolant injection step (low flow rate of injection step) in the multi stage safety injection device 300 subsequent to FIG. 13.

The water level of the safety injection tank 310 is decreased lower than the height 341 b′ of the second safety injection port 341 b, and therefore safety injection from the safety injection tank 310 into the reactor vessel 22 is carried out only through the first safety injection line 330 a, thereby implementing a low flow rate of safety injection.

A flow resistance in the case of implementing coolant injection only through one passage of the first safety injection port 341 a is relatively greater than that in the case of implementing coolant injection through two passages of the first safety injection port 341 a and second safety injection port 341 b or the case of implementing coolant injection through three passages of the first safety injection port 341 a, second safety injection port 341 b and third safety injection port 341 c, and therefore a low flow rate of safety injection can be carried out for a long period of time. The low flow rate of safety injection continues until almost of the coolant of the safety injection tank 310 is injected into the reactor vessel 22, and the injection time can be adjusted according to the design of the safety injection tank 310. At present, a time required for the operation of a passive safety system with no operator's action or emergency AC power in the passive reactor 20 is about 72 hours.

FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an injection flow rate of coolant in time in the multi stage safety injection device 300 described in FIGS. 8 through 14.

A high, a medium and a low flow rate of safety injection are all carried out from the safety injection tank in the multi stage safety injection device. A high flow rate of safety injection is carried out within a short period of time when an accident occurs. Subsequently, a medium flow rate of safety injection is carried out at the early and middle stages of the accident to implement safety injection for a longer period of time than that of the high flow rate stage. Finally, a low flow rate of safety injection is carried out for a long period of time while smoothly decreasing the injection speed thereof at the middle and late stages of the accident.

A temporary injection start time delay phenomenon is exhibited at the initial stage of opening the safety injection tank when fluid at a high temperature is condensed while being injected from the reactor vessel to the safety injection tank at a low temperature. However, subsequent to starting coolant injection by means of the multi stage safety injection device, flow rate switching may be carried out in a state that a pressure balance between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank has been made, and therefore, coolant may be continuously and successively injected without causing a problem of delay or overlap in the coolant injection during the process of flow rate switching as shown in FIG. 15.

The foregoing multi stage safety injection device may inject coolant with a single type safety injection tank in multiple stages according to the safety injection characteristics required for a reactor. Accordingly, a reactor having the multi stage safety injection device may effectively use coolant within the safety injection tank and thus additional safety injection facilities may not be provided for each pressure condition according to the required safety injection characteristic of the reactor, thereby simplifying facilities as well as reducing the economic cost.

The present disclosure can be applied to not only an integral reactor but a loop type reactor for changing a performance of the core makeup tank to multi stage. In the loop type reactor, a reactor vessel correspond to a reactor coolant system.

A passive safety injection system including a multi stage safety injection device may be formed with a fully passive type, and thus safety functions can be carried out only using natural forces contained in the system, such as gas pressure or gravity force, without using an active device such as a pump and also without an operator's action for a period of time required for the passive system when an accident occurs. Therefore, an emergency AC power system is not required, enhancing the reliability of the safety injection system and the safety of a reactor.

The flow rate change characteristics of the multi stage safety injection device may be also applicable to the performance enhancement of the safety injection tank, and thus the configurations and methods of the above-described embodiments may not be necessarily limited to a passive safety injection system in the integral reactor.

The configurations and methods according to the above-described embodiments will not be applicable in a limited way to the foregoing multi stage safety injection device and passive safety injection system having the same, and all or part of each embodiment may be selectively combined and configured to make various modifications thereto.

According to the present disclosure having the foregoing configuration, it may be possible to simplify various safety injection facilities used in a complicated manner due to the required safety injection characteristics of a reactor as a single type facility.

Furthermore, according to the present disclosure, the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel may be decreased step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank subsequent to starting coolant injection, and thus coolant can be injected only with a single type facility according to the required safety injection characteristics of a reactor being varied according to the passage of time subsequent to an accident. 

1. A multi stage safety injection device, comprising: a safety injection tank formed to contain coolant to be injected into a reactor vessel by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased; a pressure balance line connected to the reactor vessel and safety injection tank to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank; a safety injection line connected to a lower end portion of the safety injection tank and the reactor vessel to inject coolant to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank; and a flow control line extended from the safety injection line to an inner portion of the safety injection tank, and provided with safety injection ports into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.
 2. The multi stage safety injection device of claim 1, wherein the safety injection ports form a predetermined flow resistance to decrease the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel through the flow control line and the safety injection line step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.
 3. The multi stage safety injection device of claim 1, wherein the safety injection port comprises: a first safety injection port formed at a lower end portion of the flow control line to continuously provide an injection passage for coolant filled within the safety injection tank is injected into the reactor vessel; and at least one second safety injection port formed at a predetermined height from the first safety injection port to provide an injection passage for coolant until the water level of the safety injection tank becomes lower than a predetermined water level.
 4. The multi stage safety injection device of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of orifices installed at each safety injection port to adjust the flow rate of coolant that has passed any one safety injection port prior to being merged with coolant that has passed another safety injection port, and configured to form a predetermined flow resistance for the safety injection ports, respectively.
 5. The multi stage safety injection device of claim 1, further comprising: an isolation valve installed at the pressure balance line to block fluid from being injected from the reactor vessel into the safety injection tank during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs.
 6. The multi stage safety injection device of claim 1, further comprising: an isolation valve installed at the safety injection line to block the flowing of coolant from the safety injection tank to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state with the reactor vessel during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection from the safety injection tank to the reactor vessel when an accident occurs.
 7. A passive safety injection system, comprising: a core makeup tank connected to a reactor vessel to maintain a pressure balance state with the reactor vessel and inject coolant to the reactor vessel when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased; and a multi stage safety injection device connected to the reactor vessel to inject coolant step by step to the reactor vessel at a pressure lower than that of the core makeup tank after the injection of the core makeup tank, wherein the multi stage safety injection device comprises: a safety injection tank formed to contain coolant to be injected into a reactor vessel by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs in which the pressure or water level of the reactor vessel is decreased; a pressure balance line connected to the reactor vessel and safety injection tank to form a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank; a safety injection line connected to a lower end portion of the safety injection tank and the reactor vessel to inject coolant to the reactor vessel in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank; and a flow control line extended from the safety injection line to an inner portion of the safety injection tank, and provided with safety injection ports into which coolant is injected at predetermined heights, respectively, to reduce the flow rate of coolant injected into the reactor vessel step by step according to the water level reduction of the safety injection tank.
 8. The passive safety injection system of claim 7, further comprising: an isolation valve installed at the pressure balance line to block fluid from being injected from the reactor vessel into the safety injection tank during a normal plant operation, and assigned to be open by a control signal to implement coolant injection in a pressure balance state between the reactor vessel and the safety injection tank by a gravitational head of water when an accident occurs. 